|Scientific name||Scolopax rusticola||Common name||Eurasian Woodcock|
|Population name||Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa|
|Breeding range||N, E, C and parts of W Europe to Turkey & Caucasus||Non-breeding range||W & S Europe, N Africa|
|Red List Category||Least Concern|
|Ramsar regions||Africa Europe|
|Publication||Start year||End year||Minimum||Maximum||Estimate quality||Notes||References||Actions|
|WPE 2||1982||1982||15,000,000||15,000,001||No quality assessment||[R311]|
|WPE 3||1999||1999||15,000,000||15,000,001||No quality assessment||[R314]|
|WPE 4||2005||2005||10,000,000||25,000,000||No quality assessment||[S593]||[R624]|
|WPE 1||0||0||2,000,000||2,000,001||No quality assessment||[R311]|
|WPE 5||2005||2005||10,000,000||25,000,000||Expert opinion||[R624]|
|AEWA CSR 4||2005||2005||10,000,000||25,000,000||Expert opinion||[R624]|
|AEWA CSR 5||2005||2005||10,000,000||25,000,000||Expert opinion||[R624]|
|AEWA CSR 6||1992||2012||20,000,000||26,000,000||Best guess||[S8294]||[R1362] [R1361] [R63] [R624]|
|AEWA CSR 7||1991||2014||21,000,000||27,000,000||Best guess||[S9009]||[R1549]|
|AEWA CSR 8||1998||2019||15,000,000||20,000,000||Best guess||[S9434]||[R1625]|
|Publication||Start year||End year||Trend||Trend quality||Notes||References||Actions|
|WPE 2||1973||1983||STA||No quality assessment||[R311]|
|WPE 3||1990||2000||STA||No quality assessment||[R230]|
|WPE 4||1990||2000||STA||No quality assessment||[R230]|
|WPE 1||0||0||Unknown||No quality assessment|
|AEWA CSR 4||1990||2000||STA||Poor||[R230]|
|AEWA CSR 5||1990||2000||STA||Poor||[R230]|
|AEWA CSR 6||2000||2012||STA||Poor||[T6294]||[R1362] [R1361] [R1279]|
|AEWA CSR 7||2000||2012||STA||Poor||[T7100]||[R1549] [R1607] [R1451] [R1608]|
|AEWA CSR 8||2009||2018||DEC||Reasonable||[T7572]||[R1625] [R1730] [R1742] [R1743] [R1744]|
Population 1% level
|AEWA CSR 4||-1||-1||Not Set|
|AEWA CSR 5||-1||-1||Not Set|
|AEWA CSR 6||-1||-1||Not Set|
|AEWA CSR 7||2018||240000|
|AEWA CSR 8||2018||240000|
- R311 - Hepburn, I.R. 1983. Hunting bags and population of woodcock in Europe. pp. 138-145. In: Kalchreuter, H. (ed.). Proc. 2nd European Woodcock and Snipe Workshop. Fordingbridge.
- R314 - Hirschfield, E., Roselaar, C.S. and Shirihai, H. 2000. Identification, taxonomy and distribution of Greater and Lesser Sandplovers. British Birds 93 (4): 162-189.
- R230 - Ferrand, Y. and Gossmann, F. 2001. Elements for a Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola) management plan. Game and Wildlife Science 18(1): 115-139.
- R624 - Thorup, O. (comp) 2006. Breeding Waders in Europe 2000. International Wader Studies 14. International Wader Study Group, UK.
- R1279 - Ferrand Y., and Gossman, F. 2009. La B?casse des bois. Histoire naturelle.-Saint-Lucien : Effet de Lisi?re, 223 pp.
- R1362 - European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity (in prep) Population and trend data provided by the EU Member States in the frame of their reporting under Article 12 of the EU Birds Directive. Online fact sheets. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, Paris. URL: http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Reporting/Article_12/Reports_2013/Member_State_Deliveries. Accessed on 31 July 2014.
- R1361 - BirdLife International, BTO, EBCC, CSO, IUCN, RSPB, SOVON, Wetlands International (in prep) Population and trend data provided to the European Red List of Birds Project funded by the European Commission. Digital dataset. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. Accessed on 31 July 2014.
- R63 - BirdLife International (2004)b. Birds in Europe, population estimates, trends and conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12).
- R1549 - BirdLife International 2015. European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://datazone.birdlife.org/info/euroredlist
- R1607 - FANBO 2017. FANBPO Annual Report on Woodcock (FAROW); 2015-2016 hunting season. URL: http://www.fanbpo.fr/uploaded/rapport-annuel-de-la-fanbpo-sur-la-ba-casse-saison-de-chasse-2015-2016.pdf
- R1451 - Stroud, D. A. (2004). Status of migratory wader populations in Africa and Western Eurasia in the 1990s. International Wader Study Group.
- R1608 - Ferrand, Y. 2006. Sixth European Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group Workshop â€“ Proceedings of an international symposium of the Wetlands International Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group, 25-27 November 2003, Nantes, France. International Wader Studies 13, Wageningen,The Netherlands.
- R1625 - BirdLife International (in prep) European Red List of Birds. Deliverable to the European Commission (DG Environment) in 2021 under Service Contract ENV.D.3/SER/2018/0018.
- R1730 - LindstrÃ¶m, Ã…., M. Green, M. Husby, J.A. KÃ¥lÃ¥s, A. Lehikoinen & M. Stjernman. 2019. Population trends of waders on their boreal and arctic breeding grounds in northern Europe. Wader Study 126(3): 200â€“216.
- R1742 - Blokhin, Y., Artemenkov, D. and Fokin, S. (2018). The results of the 20 years of national roding census. WI/IUCN-WSSG Newsletter 44: 9-14
- R1743 - Passerault, M., Coreau, D., Gossmann, F., Boussac, L. and Le Rest, K. (2018). 2017-2018 French Woodcock Report. WI/IUCN-WSSG Newsletter 44: 25-28.
- R1744 - Christensen, T.K. (2018). Woodcock hunting in Denmark 2017/18, and notes on ringing in 2018. WI/IUCN-WSSG Newsletter 44: 6-8
- S593 - For populations over 2 million birds, Ramsar Convention criterion 5 (20,000 or more waterbirds) applies.
- S8294 - European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity (in prep.) and BirdLife International et al. (in prep.) provide updated breeding population estimates for the EU MS (except CZ and GR), CH, NO and TR which sum up to 6,810,125-8,580,973 pairs. According to BirdLife International (2004), further 10,299-18,088 pairs can be in AL, AD, HR, CZ, GR, LI, MK, RS, ME and UA. This yields a total estimate of 6,820,424-8,599,061 pairs, i.e. 20,000,000-26,000,000 individuals after rounding. This new estimate agrees well with the estimate of Thorup (2006). The refinement is largely due to a more precise estimate from RU.
- T6294 - Overall trend based on national estimates is stable. Decreasing in LV, SI, SK and the UK, not increasing anywhere, unknown in AT, BG, HU, IT, LU, NL, NO, PL, RO, TR and considered to be stable elsewhere (European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, in prep., BirdLife International et al. in prep.). Ferrand and Gossman (2009) also considered the trend stable.
- S9009 - 6,998,601-8,850,558 pairs.
- T7100 - BirdLife International (2015) has assessed the short-term trend of the European breeding population as stable with a slight declining tendency. FANBO (2017) reported also a stable short-term (2006/2007 - 2015/2016) but with a slightly increasing tendency. The long-term trend appears to be declining (0.9708-0.9981). In the long-term, the population thought to be decreasing by 5-30% in RU (hosting 84% of the population) and in CH, SI, SK, TR and UK (<5% in total). The population is thought to be stable in CZ, DK, FI, LI and LV (<5% in total), stable in DE, EE, ES, FR, GR, LT, RS and SE (the latter hosting about 8% of the population), fluctuating in BA and UA, unknown in AD, AL, AT, BG, HR, HU, IE, IT, LU, ME, MK, NL, NO, PL, RO and XK. Only two countries, FI and FR classified the quality of their long-term trend assessment as good, the rest is medium or poor (BirdLife International 2015). The significant long-term decline assessment depends primarily on the poor quality assessment of RU. Delany et al. (2009) has reviewed earlier claims of decline in RU and other evidence and considered the population remaining relatively stable also in the long-term following the assessments of Stroud (2004) and Ferrand et al. (2006).
- S9434 - The size of the breeding population is estimated at 4,893,206-6,734,134 pairs, or 15,000,000-20,000,000 individuals after rounding in AD, AL, AT, BA, BE, BG, BY, CH, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, LI, LT, LU, LV, ME, MK, NL, NO, PL, RO, RS, RU, SE, SI, SK, TR, UA, GB, XK based on data from the period of 1998-2019. The main difference comes from revised estimate for RU. It was reduced from 6,000,000-7,000,000 pairs to 4,000,000-5,000,000 pairs.
- T7572 - Based on BirdLife International (in prep.), it is estimated that the breeding population has decreased by 4-18% (equivalent to 7-26% in 3 generations) in BA, BY, CH, DE, EE, FI, FR, GR, LT, LV, NL, RS, RU, SE, UA, GB between 2009 and 2018. No quantitative trend information is available from AD, AT, BE, BG, CZ, DK, ES, HR, HU, IE, IT, LU, ME, MK, NO, PL, RO, SI, SK, TR, XK, AL. It has decreased by 11-33% in BY, CH, DE, DK, EE, FI, FR, IT, LT, NL, RS, RU, SE, UA, GB, AL between 1980 and 2018. No quantitative trend information is available from AD, AT, BA, BE, BG, CZ, ES, GR, HR, HU, IE, LU, LV, ME, MK, NO, PL, RO, SI, SK, TR, XK, i.e. the majority of the population. LindstrÃ¶m et al. (2019) reported a statistically not significant decline of 0.9% p.a. for the Fennoscandian population between 2006 and 2018. Blokhin et al. (2018) reported also decline in RU based on roding intensity between 1999/2000 and 2007/2018. Decline in breeding birds has been also reported from FR between 1988 and 2018 (Passerault et al., 2018). Based on Danish wing samples, Christensen reported that the juvenile-adult ratio is close to the average of 1.4 juv/adult since 2002/03. However, this is still markedly lower than the average of 2.1 juv/adult recorded during the period 1985/86-2001/02.
Copyright Wetlands International 2012 Citation: Wetlands International (). "Waterbird Population Estimates" . Retrieved from wpe.wetlands.org on